Dear All: Last November I asked Bill Rees, a pioneer in the field of environmental economics and ecology, if climate change had killed the environmental movement. He responded “. . . climate change is our eco focus. And I guess I would argue that this very simplistic, very simple, very singular focus… is a distraction from the real problem, which is something called human ecological overshoot.” I’ve wanted to explore that question further and separate fact from fantasy, so I invited friends to a discussion titled, “Climate Change – Science or Theology”. My guest Michael Axelrod, a retired scientist who worked at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, believes that in pushing the climate change narrative, science has suffered. “I would say, we are in worse condition now in the science enterprise than the Soviet Union was. This because the corruption and politicization extend the scope which is much wider. There’s hardly an area that’s not affected by this. Let’s take one thing that’s very neutral, okay – Mathematics. Now, mathematics has become politicized!” Another guest, KMO, aptly stated, “Concentrations of atmospheric carbon as measured in parts per million is so disconnected from the lived experience of any mammal that any emotionally crippling obsession with the topic is a symptom of a nature deficit disorder. That said, the climate doomers holistic consciousness may have supplied them with the very correct intuition that they are confronted by something impersonal, unstoppable, and all consuming. Their initial intuition was correct, but they went astray when they accepted someone else’s ready-made articulation of that intuition.” There was a time when the environmental movement focused on tangible goals – clean-up rivers, lakes, oceans and the air; preserve open spaces and get rid of hazardous chemicals. To these very real problems, the climate change narrative has created an abstraction that is easy to game. “In This Together How Republicans, Democrats, Capitalists and Activists Are Uniting to Tackle Climate Change and More”, the authors claim , “the right and left are being artificially divided because it is profitable for the media and political industries. The fear and hate they are generating is extreme. We feed into it, when we focus on fear, and drive hatred of our adversaries. . .” In closing, I agree with Tucker Max who said, “one of the great travesties I think of the last 30 years is that the conservation movement and the environmental movement weren’t one and the same.” Sadly, our fixation on human driven climate change is neither improving the environment nor our relationship to it. In solidarity, |
This short clip from an interview with author and unlikely homesteader, Tucker Max grabs you with its authenticity and conviction – the “travesty of the past 30 years” is that the environmental and conservationism movement were not one. |
Having just celebrated Earth Day it seemed appropriate to interview Brian Czech, Executive Director of the Center for the Advancement of Steady State Economics (CASSE.) A steady state economy entails a stabilized population, as well as, per capita consumption and minimizing waste and other externalities. Pursuing this type of economy will not only positively impact the environment it will benefit our quality of life. Tune into our conversation in which we covered a lot of bases and took aim at several sacred cows on both sides of the political divide. |
In many respects climate change has assumed the status of a world religion replete with zealous adherents and detractors. And it raises the question, is it science or is it theology? To answer, Michael Axelrod and KMO, who come from very diverse backgrounds, examine the issue from a truly unique perspective. Buckle up prepare to nerd out on a wild ride through science and philosophy. Buckle up and prepare to nerd out on a wild ride through science and philosophy. |
Last November we interviewed Bill Rees, an ecological economist and luminary in today’s ecological movement. Bill presents a robust and data driven narrative that should be the basis of environmental, trade, energy and manufacturing policy in the 21st century. Few sacred cows from both sides of the climate change debate, came away unscathed. Watch and find the answers to questions such as, was Thomas Malthus right and did the Climate Change narrative kill the ecological movement? |
Join us! Click to get updates and news, as well as information about how to get involved regarding topics important to all of us such as the environment, American jobs, economic security, the impact of various forms of immigration, and much more.
|
What Happened To Alphabet and Google Search? |
What Are Non-Compete Agreements? How Do They Impact Highly Skilled American Workers? |
Biden’s Proposed Rule Change Is A Kick In The Teeth To American Workers |
Congress Shuns Passenger Safety in FAA Reauthorization |
Cotton: Revoke Hate-Speakers F-1 Visas, Free Speech Rights Abusers |
AG Garland MIA during Campus Upheavals |
Betrayed Again! Johnson Gives U.S. Workers Stick’s Short End |
On Earth Day, Border Crisis Creates Enviro Worries |
Roughly 9.14 million people have entered the country since President Biden took office. This is more than the past three administrations combined. Aside from the fact many have entered illegally, they have come from countries with very low individual carbon footprints versus a very high average individual carbon footprint here in the U.S.
After analyzing 93% of the immigrants and the carbon emissions of their countries of origin, we came to the conclusion that we need to be concerned about what is going on at the border. Consider if those 9.14 million aliens are allowed to stay here, each year they will be creating an additional 110,675,667 tons of carbon emissions versus 25.6 million tons had they stayed in their own countries.
|
China is flooding the U.S. with cheap solar panel exports, causing a Massachusetts solar company to cancel plans for a $1.4 billion U.S. factory. Read More |
The Biden administration has so far spent only 17% of the $1.6 trillion in federal funding on green infrastructure and energy projects, according to Politico. See where all this spending will go in the coming years. Read More |
Hannah Dreier, from the New York Times, won the Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting this week. Check out her story from last year on how big business (meat packing, food processing, etc.) is exploiting migrant children. Read More |
Her story from this year shows where all the unaccompanied children who illegally crossed the border ended up in the U.S. Read More |
The decision to shutter this West Virginia steel plant came after the U.S. International Trade Commission chose not to implement tariffs on tin imports from China, Germany and Canada, and also stopped an investigation of South Korean imports. Read More |